21Oct 2009 by Grant Fritchey 1 Comment

Characters

SQL Server, T-SQL, Tools
No, I'm not talking about a Dickens novel. I'm talking about the number of characters in a string. I had a painful time recently because of the word "characters."  If you take a look at the dynamic management view sys.dm_exec_sql_text you can get the queries that have been run on your system that are still in the cache. It's a great utility. Better still, you can get specific statements from the code that are actively running through sys.dm_exec_requests or ones that have run through sys.dm_exec_query_stats. To do this is very simple. Each of these DMV's has a pair of columns, statement_start_offset and statement_end_offset. These columns, and I'm quoting directly from books online measure the "number of character" offset from the beginning of the SQL string and from the end of…
Read More
21Oct 2009 by Grant Fritchey No Comments

Free Training RIGHT NOW

SQL Server, T-SQL
Quest Connect 2009 is occurring even as I type this. Get on over there if you're interested in some free training. I recorded a session on understanding execution plans. But even better, there are live sessions with some great people. Stop reading this, click the link, get yourself some free training.
Read More
13Oct 2009 by Grant Fritchey 5 Comments

Table Variables Are Only in Memory: Fact or Myth

SQL Server, T-SQL
I keep seeing these concepts that have long been disproven, posted again and again on newsgroups as if they were valid information. The latest? Table variables are better because they're only in memory where as temporary tables write to the disk through tempdb. This one is abjectly wrong. I'm not even going to hedge with "it depends." From a macro point of view, there are only a few differences between temporary tables and table variables, statistics being the biggest. Temporary tables have 'em and table variables don't. Other than that, both will reside completely in memory or will swap out to the disk through tempdb, depending on their size. Some of the minor differences, and why you might want to use table variables over temporary tables, table variables won't cause a statement recompile while temporary tables will, table…
Read More
05Oct 2009 by Grant Fritchey 15 Comments

Ad Hoc Queries Don’t Reuse Execution Plans: Myth or Fact

SQL Server, T-SQL
Another frequently heard story is that stored procedures get and reuse execution plans, but ad hoc queries do not. A lot of people believe this and say as much online and in the real world. Unlike my last myth, this time, I'm going to give you the DBA answer to this question. It depends. There are ad hoc queries and there are ad hoc queries. The classic ad hoc query looks like this: DECLARE @sql NVARCHAR(MAX), @value int; SET @value = 43668; SET @sql = 'SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader AS soh '; SET @sql = @sql + 'JOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail AS sod '; SET @sql = @sql + 'ON soh.SalesOrderID = sod.SalesOrderID '; SET @sql = @sql + 'WHERE soh.SalesOrderID = ' + CAST(@value AS NVARCHAR); EXEC (@sql); And as ad…
Read More
30Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey 27 Comments

Pre-Compiled Stored Procedures: Fact or Myth

SQL Server, T-SQL
There's a very common belief among DBA's: Stored procedures are pre-compiled. I had someone tell me all about it just last week. There are lots of sources that say what I'm getting ready to say, so this really shouldn't come as news to anyone,but it will. No, they're not. Stored procedures are not pre-compiled. When you create or update a stored procedure on the server, it gets a syntax check. But there is no compile process, let alone a pre-compile process. That stored procedure exists exactly as it is named, a procedure that is stored on the server. It's just a collection of TSQL code, possibly with some parameters, waiting to be called. Until it's called, it is not ready to be executed. Don't believe me? I'm not a huge…
Read More
22Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey No Comments

Gila Monster on Estimated vs. Actual Row Counts

SQL Server, T-SQL
I don't generally do lots of blog aggregation and cross post linking & stuff. It's just not something I'm that into. However, this time is an exception. Gail Shaw, Gila Monster to those who hang on out SQL Server Central, has posted an excellent explanation of times when Estimated and Actual row counts vary for a reason. I'm one of those who emphasises that differences between estimated & actual is an indication of... something. It could be out of date or missing statistics or it could be caused by query language like multi-statement table valued functions, but it's usually and indication of a problem. Except when it's not. Read Gail's explanation for more.
Read More
21Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey 6 Comments

Identifying Frequently Running Queries

SQL Server, T-SQL
It's not enough to look at the longest running query. What if you have two queries, one runs for 5 minutes and the other runs for 5 seconds. Which do you tune? The first one, of course. But, let's add a little information to our thought experiment. The one that runs for 5 minutes is called 2AM, your local time, when there are almost no users on the system and the one that runs for 5 seconds is called 40 times a minute all day long. Now, which one do you tune? That's right, suddenly that 5 second query takes on a HUGE significance based on how often it's called. But how do you know how often a query is called? The easiest way to gather that information is not…
Read More
15Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey 2 Comments

More Free Training

SQL Server, T-SQL
Quest Connect 2009, taking place in October 21 for 24 hours, looks like it's going to have 64 different sessions, live and recorded, by a variety of the names in the industry. It's another chance to dig in and learn the details on a variety of topics from some of the top names in the business. Can you say Tom LaRock? How about Tim Ford? I know you want to hear from Brent Ozar. Those are just some of the featured speakers. There are a whole slew of others, it's worth pursuing, and did I mention, the price is right. I recorded a session for them last night. It's on the basics of understanding execution plans.
Read More
15Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey 30 Comments

No Join Predicate

SQL Server, T-SQL
You could be looking at an execution plan on a query and see this message: Warning, No Join Predicate. With a very few exceptions (very few), that's not a warning, like "Mind the gap" or "Your Mileage May Vary" or "Never fight a land war in Asia." No. It's a screaming shout saying "BY ALL THE GODS IN VALHALA, YOU DON'T HAVE ANY JOIN PREDICATES IN THIS QUERY!" Seriously, that's exactly what it says. But, you might be asking yourself, that's what it says, but what does it mean? Please allow me to explain. The tables in your system, whether it's a classic BI star schema, or a highly normalized OLTP system, or even (shudder) ORM objects, are related to one another. Usually they're related through the use of primary…
Read More
11Sep 2009 by Grant Fritchey No Comments

LaRock on Monitoring

SQL Server, T-SQL
Since I just spent a bit more than half of my 24 Hours of PASS presentation on tuning queries talking about monitoring performance, you could probably tell that I think that the two are inextricably linked. I'm not alone. Tom LaRock has put a post on why it's important to understand the extent of your problem prior to attempting to fix it. It's absolutely spot-on and a must read. Remember, if someone says performance on a system you manage is slow, you have to ask, as compared to what? You need to understand what "normal" performance is on your system in order to arrive at the ability to identify a particular process as performing in an abnormal manner. That's not to say that you couldn't tune a query in complete…
Read More